Online Questions - Valid Practice To your CT-TAE Exam (Updated 82 Questions)
Practice To CT-TAE - Remarkable Practice On your Certified Tester Test Automation Engineer Exam
The Certified Tester Test Automation Engineer (CT-TAE) exam is a globally recognized certification program offered by the International Software Testing Qualifications Board (ISTQB). Certified Tester Test Automation Engineer certification is designed to enhance the skills and knowledge of professionals involved in test automation. The CT-TAE certification validates the ability to design, develop, and maintain automated tests, as well as the ability to analyze and optimize automated test cases and test suites.
ISTQB CT-TAE (Certified Tester Test Automation Engineer) Certification Exam is a globally recognized certification program that assesses the skills and knowledge of individuals in the field of test automation engineering. Certified Tester Test Automation Engineer certification provides individuals with a deeper understanding of the principles and best practices of test automation and enhances their credibility as test automation engineers. Certified Tester Test Automation Engineer certification is recognized by leading organizations worldwide and is highly valued by employers, making it an ideal choice for professionals who want to advance their careers in the field of test automation engineering.
NEW QUESTION # 25
Consider the following example of TAS metrics.
Time to execute automated tests
Speed and efficiency of TAS components
Which of the following statements is TRUE?
- A. A is an internal TAS metric and B is an external TAS metric
- B. A and B are both internal TAS metrics
- C. A is and external TAS metric and b is an internal TAS metric
- D. A and b are both external TAS metric
Answer: B
Explanation:
Both the time to execute automated tests and the speed and efficiency of TAS components are considered internal TAS metrics. Internal metrics are those that relate directly to the performance and effectiveness of the Test Automation System (TAS) itself, rather than its impact on external processes or outcomes. The time to execute automated tests measures how long the TAS takes to run a set of tests, which is a key factor in assessing the efficiency and performance of the automation. Similarly, the speed and efficiency of TAS components are directly related to how well the internal parts of the TAS are functioning. These metrics are crucial for understanding and improving the internal workings of the TAS, making them both internal metrics.
NEW QUESTION # 26
You are testing a major enhancement to an air traffic control user interface. You have use of a sophisticated pre-production test environment, created specifically for large scale automated regression, performance and security testing. The window for regression testing is limited and must successfully conclude, with no major regressions remaining, before the non-functional testing starts.
You have been using the same version of the TAS for the last few releases, each time completing the automated regression test suite in a single overnight run. However, due to the latest enhancements for the SUT, you believe there is a risk that the test suite may no longer complete overnight and therefore delay performance and security testing.
Which option would be the BEST and MOST cost-efficient approach to mitigate this risk?
- A. Split the regression test suite into multiple parts, running in the environment across consecutive nights.
- B. Create a mirror of the pre-production test environment and split the regression test suite to run in parallel across the environments.
- C. Introduce better coding practices for the automation scripts, including coding guidelines, reviews and improved static analysis.
- D. Analyse the regression test suite and remove test coverage duplication and redundancy.
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 27
A TAS uses a commercial test automation tool and the default logs generated by the inconsistent formats such as different types of messages (pass/fail steps, screenshots, warnings, etc.) To solve this issue some custom logging functions have been created from the test scripts, making it possible to log the different types of messages with the same format. However, this may cause a problem due to excessive size of the logs which can make it difficult to find the required information. Assume that all the default logs will be disabled when running the automated tests and that some tests will not generate excessively sized logs.
Which of the following represents the BEST suggestion for implementing the custom logging functions?
- A. Implement the custom logging functions to redirect the logs to multiple files
- B. Implement the custom logging functions to support different levels of tracing
- C. Implement the custom logging functions without saving timestamps
- D. Implement the custom logging functions without saving stack traces
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 28
Which of the following metrics could suggest, under certain condition that an automated regression test suite has NOT been updated for new functionalities added to the SUT?
- A. The ratio of comments to executable statements in the SUT code.
- B. The SUT code coverage provided by the execution of the regression test suite.
- C. The ratio of commands to executable statements in the automation code of the regression test suite
- D. The defect density in the automation code of the regression test suite.
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 29
You have been asked to determine a TAS for a new release of a SUT, test should be automated wherever. The new release will consist of 5 new interfaces and an amendment to 3 existing interfaces. The new and amended interface will be deliver incrementally in 3 sprints, each lasting 2 weeks.
What would be the BEST Test Automation Solution (TAS) design in this scenario?
- A. Automate tests at both Component and System Level. Only do this automation once every interface has been fully developed or amended and manual testing has completed successfully.
- B. Automate a test at once level, component level, Create customized interface/test hooks for this level where the interface has not yet been developed or amended.
- C. Automate the tests at two levels, Component and System level. Create customized hooks at Component level for interface not yet developed or amended. Only use the newly developed or amended interfaces to test at System level.
- D. Automate tests at one level only, System level. Use only the newly developed interfaces and do not create any customized interfaces/test hooks.
Answer: C
Explanation:
The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer guidelines emphasize the importance of a Test Automation Architecture (TAA) that is flexible and maintainable. In the scenario described, automating tests at both the Component and System levels allows for early detection of defects and continuous integration of changes.
Customized hooks at the Component level enable testing of interfaces that are under development, which is crucial for incremental delivery in Agile environments. Testing only the newly developed or amended interfaces at the System level ensures that the automation is focused on the changes that are most relevant to the release.
References = The answer is based on the principles outlined in the ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus, which discusses the design, development, and maintenance of test automation solutions, as well as the automation of dynamic functional tests and their relationship to test management, configuration management, defect management, software development processes, and quality assurance123.
NEW QUESTION # 30
You have implemented a keyword-driven scripting framework, which uses a test execution tool to run the tests. This has been in use for the past year and all of the teams now use this framework as the standard approach for test execution.
The teams all work on different aspects of the SUT and they have all experienced significant benefits in the use of this scripting framework. However, on closer examination, you have discovered that there are numerous instances where the teams have the same functionality to test but are using different keywords.
One of your objectives for improvement is to create consistency among the teams.
What is the BEST way to handle this situation?
- A. Do nothing, each team are working in isolation and they are all experiencing significant benefits in the way they are currently working.
- B. Move to a model-based approach to scripting where the models include the keywords.
- C. Create a central library of keywords and associated definitions for each team to use.
- D. Provide each team with a set of guidelines and naming conventions for keywords.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Establishing a central library of keywords and associated definitions ensures consistency across different teams working on the same System Under Test (SUT). This approach not only promotes uniformity in keyword usage but also facilitates better communication, maintenance, and scalability of the test automation framework. By having a shared repository of keywords, teams can avoid duplication of effort and reduce the risk of discrepancies in test implementation. This centralization aligns with the ISTQB's principles of efficient test automation architecture and management.
References = The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer (CT-TAE) documents and training resources emphasize the importance of a consistent and maintainable test automation framework. The creation of a central library of keywords is a recommended practice to achieve this consistency, as it supports the definition, implementation, and execution layers of a generic test automation architecture12.
NEW QUESTION # 31
Your goal is to verify completeness, consistency and correct behavior of an automated test suite. The TAS has been proven to successfully install in the SUT environment. All the preliminary checks to verify the correct functioning of the automated test environment and test tool configuration, installation and setup have successfully completed.
Which of the following is NOT a relevant check for achieving your goal in this scenario?
- A. Checking whether all the test cases produce repeatable outcomes
- B. Checking whether the loading of the TAS is repeatable in the SUT environment
- C. Checking whether all the test cases contain the expected results
- D. Checking whether the post condition have been fulfilled for all the test cases
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 32
You are a TAE working for a software house which provides quarterly releases of its software to its customers.
There are many different versions of the SUT that need to be tested simultaneously by different tests teams.
Your TAS is complex and you need to ensure it remains consistent across the different SUT environments.
What is the BEST and MOST efficient way to ensure each of the test teams use the same version of the TAS to test the different versions of the SUT?
- A. Produce comprehensive documentation of the TAS, installation and usage guidelines and provide training for each team member.
- B. Due to the complexities involved and the high risks associated with these releases, it would be best to revert to manual testing.
- C. Develop a tool to track historical test results across the different SUT environments and look for trends.
- D. Install the TAS is a central repository and have an automated installation and configuration of the TAS from this repository to each of the SUT environments.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Observability in the context of a System Under Test (SUT) refers to the degree to which the system provides insights into its behavior, allowing users to understand the status of various actions performed. This enables users to verify that the system's actual behavior matches the expected behavior. Observability is crucial for diagnosing issues, understanding system performance, and ensuring that the system functions correctly.
References = The concept of observability is covered in the ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus, which discusses the importance of designing a system that provides clear and understandable interfaces giving control and visibility on all test levels. This includes the ability of the SUT to provide interfaces that give insight into the system, which is essential for creating effective and maintainable automated tests1.
NEW QUESTION # 33
Which of the following attributes should NOT be included in a test execution report associated with a suite of automated tests?
- A. Environment in which the tests have been executed
- B. Summary of the test execution results
- C. Defect clusters identified during test execution
- D. System/Application under test and its version
Answer: C
Explanation:
In the context of automated test execution reports, the inclusion of defect clusters is not typically recommended. The primary focus of such reports is to provide a summary of the test execution results, details about the system or application under test along with its version, and the environment in which the tests were executed. Defect clusters, while important in the overall testing process, are generally managed separately from the execution report, often in defect management tools or systems designed for tracking and analyzing defects.
References = The answer is based on the ISTQB CT-TAE guidelines which specify the content that should be included in a test automation report. According to the guidelines, the report should include a summary of the execution results, the system being tested, and the environment in which the tests were run. Defect clusters are not mentioned as part of the report's content and are therefore considered irrelevant to be included in the test execution report1.
NEW QUESTION # 34
When the SUT provides insight into the behaviour of the system, providing the users the with the status of the various actions performed so that they can check that expected behaviour equals actual behaviour, what is this called?
- A. Controllability.
- B. Maintainability.
- C. Observability.
- D. Portability.
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 35
In order to achieve re-use of a TAS, where SHOULD the design for reuse occur?
- A. At the code level
- B. At the TAA level
- C. At the framework level.
- D. At the TAS level
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 36
What is NOT a factor in considering when you are asked to ensure an effective transition from manual to automated tests?
- A. Complexity to automate the manual test cases
- B. Correctness of test data and test cases
- C. The controllability of the SUT
- D. The look and feel of the SUT
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 37
A regression test suite consist of 500 test cases which are all executed manually. The business case for a pilot project is based on the adoption of test automation using a commercial tool that will reduce the execution time by a factor of 90% for 100% of the tests in the regression test suite. The pilot project lasted one month ( as planned) and you are currently its results. At the end of the pilot project, 40% of the regression tests have been automated and their execution time has been reduce by 60%.
Which of the following statements is TRUE in this scenario?
- A. The duration of the pilot project was too short -it should last unit the success factors are achieved
- B. The target defined for the business case seems difficult to hit - it should be realistic
- C. The project selected for the pilot is too critical -if should not be too critical or too trivial
- D. The target defined for the business case is too accurate -it should not be measureable
Answer: B
Explanation:
The business case for the pilot project set a very ambitious target: reducing the execution time by 90% for all tests in the regression suite. However, at the end of the pilot, only 40% of the tests were automated with a 60% reduction in execution time. This indicates that the initial target may have been unrealistic within the given timeframe and resources. It's important for business cases to set achievable goals to ensure that the project can meet its objectives and provide a clear return on investment. Setting realistic targets also helps maintain stakeholder confidence and support for the project. References = The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus and related materials discuss the importance of realistic planning and setting achievable targets in the context of test automation projects. These resources emphasize that while test automation can significantly improve efficiency, the extent and speed of these improvements must be realistically assessed based on the specific context of the project12345.
NEW QUESTION # 38
Which of the following success factors for a test automation project is TRUE?
- A. Automated tests must be designed to capture only the data that is strictly needed for comparing expected and actual results
- B. The test cases to be automated must have a high dependency on particular data values
- C. Automated tests that fail due to changes in the requirements of the SUT should be promptly fixed rather than disabled from the test suite
- D. The test cases to be automated first must always be selected based on the number of times a test will need to be run
Answer: C
Explanation:
The success of a test automation project is contingent upon the maintenance and adaptability of the test suite to evolving requirements. When automated tests fail due to changes in the System Under Test (SUT), it is crucial to address these failures by updating the tests to align with the new requirements. This ensures that the test suite remains effective and relevant, providing accurate validation for the SUT. Disabling failing tests can lead to gaps in test coverage and diminish the integrity of the test suite, which is why prompt fixing is recommended over disabling.
References = The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus emphasizes the importance of maintaining and adapting test automation to meet new requirements. It outlines the need for test automation solutions to be designed, developed, and maintained with a focus on the dynamic nature of functional tests and their relationship to test management, configuration management, and defect management1234.
NEW QUESTION # 39
As a TAE you are evaluating a functional test automation tool that will be for several projects within your organization. The projects require that tool to work effectively and efficiently with SUT's in distributed environments. The test automated tool also needs to interface with other existing test tools (test management tool and defect tracking tool.) The existing test tools subject to planned updates and their interface to the test automated tool may not work property after these updates.
Which of the following are the two LEAST important concerns related to the evaluation of the test automation in this scenario?
Is the test automation tool able to launch processors and execute test cases on multiple machines in different environments?
Does the test automation tool support a licensing scheme that allows accessing different sets?
Does the test automation tool have a large feature set, but only part of the features will be sets?
Do the release notes for the planned updates on existing specify the impacts on their interfaces to other tools?
Does the test automation tool need to install specific libraries that could impact the SUT?
- A. A and C
- B. A and E
- C. B and E
- D. C and D
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 40
A web application was released into production one year ago, it has regular release which follow a V-model lifecycle and testing is well-established and fully integration into the development lifecycle. You have been asked to implement a TAS for the regression test suite. The regression tests have been developed via the GUI and are expected to be run at least four times a month, for each planned release, for the whole operation solution life of the system (six years). Each screen of the GUI uses several third-party controls which are not compatible with the existing automation solutions. The environment for the automation will be stable, fully controllable and separated from other environments (development, staging, production).
What could be the MOST problematic for this TAS?
- A. Sustainability of the automated environment
- B. Maturity of the test process
- C. Frequency of use
- D. Complexity to automate
Answer: D
Explanation:
The most significant challenge in implementing a Test Automation System (TAS) for the given scenario is the complexity to automate, primarily due to the use of several third-party controls that are not compatible with existing automation solutions. This incompatibility introduces a high level of complexity because it may require custom solutions or workarounds to automate these controls. Additionally, the need to run the regression tests at least four times a month for each planned release over the system's entire operational life further compounds the complexity, as it necessitates a robust and maintainable automation framework that can handle frequent executions without significant maintenance overhead.
References = The answer is derived from the ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus, which emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate tools and designing a maintainable and scalable automation framework that can handle the complexities of the application under test12. The syllabus also discusses the challenges and considerations when automating tests that involve third-party controls and components12.
NEW QUESTION # 41
As the TAE, you are working with the organisation's Test Manager to decide which external metrics and which internal metrics should be gathered for the new TAS.
Which of the following represents the BEST internal metric that would help measure the quality of the TAS and the number of problems associated with the TAS?
- A. The average maintenance cost to keep an automated test in sync with the SUT
- B. A measure of how many automated tests pass and fail
- C. A measure of defect density within the TAS automation code
- D. The number of hours of manual test effort saved by implementing a TAS
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 42
A major component of your organisation's Test Automaton Solution (TAS) is a popular open-source third-party capture-replay tool for automated functional testing.
Which two of the following must the Test Automation Engineer (TAE) ensure happens for this TAS?
a) The third party tool is placed under configuration management control.
b) The annual support and maintenance costs are agreed with the tool's vendor.
c) It is Important to obtain information about updates and new versions of the tool so that the third party tool is kept up to date.
d) Ensure that the TAS test scripts are integrated into the tool's framework.
e) Ensure that no changes are made to the tool, because modifications are not allowed for third party products.
- A. c and d
- B. a and b
- C. a and c
- D. d and e
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 43
Your company is new to test automation and as TAE. you have designed a TAS which successfully supports the SUT for the current project.
There are other systems currently in operation which have been tested manually and more systems are planned over the coming years. Based on this success, your company requires test automation be rolled out to other current and future SUTs with consistency being a key objective.
Which of the following is the BEST way to achieve that?
- A. Install the current TAS into a central repository so that other tests on different SUTs use the same version of the TAS.
- B. Design a new TAS for each SUT, and manage each one through a dedicated automation support team.
- C. Check for correct connectivity to internal and external systems to ensure that the TAS has been installed and configured correctly for each SUT.
- D. Develop a tool that keeps track of automation failures across the different SUTs and produces regular reports to stakeholders.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Installing the current Test Automation System (TAS) into a central repository allows for consistent use across different Systems Under Test (SUTs). This approach promotes reusability and maintainability of the automation scripts and resources, which is crucial for a company that is expanding its test automation efforts.
By using the same version of the TAS, the company ensures that all teams are working with the same tools and standards, which facilitates collaboration and reduces the complexity associated with managing multiple versions of the TAS. Additionally, it helps in streamlining the automation process, as updates and improvements to the TAS can be disseminated quickly and efficiently to all SUTs.
References = The answer is based on the principles outlined in the ISTQB Test Automation Engineer certification materials, which emphasize the importance of consistency, maintainability, and efficiency in test automation practices123.
NEW QUESTION # 44
You are implementing a TAS for a system that has been live for over three years, using a hybrid waterfall and agile lifecycle. Live updates are made on a monthly basis.
There is no test team, with developers designing and executing unit and integration tests with some degree of automation and business analysts designing and executing manual tests at the system level. No formal test process exists, although the system has proved relatively stable for most of the time.
Unfortunately, the last two monthly releases were problematic with regression defects found in production.
Your priority is the automation of functional regression tests at the system level, the budget for this has been approved by project stakeholders.
The Business Analysts have identified which test cases are most suitable for regression. You must use the organisation's long standing commercial automation tool which has passed a proof of concept in the platform for the system in question.
Which of the following suitability criteria needs the MOST attention for the TAS?
- A. Maturity of the test process
- B. Frequency of use.
- C. Technical planning in support of ROI analysis
- D. Compatibility and tool support
Answer: A
Explanation:
The maturity of the test process needs the most attention because it is fundamental to the successful implementation of a Test Automation System (TAS). Given that there is no formal test process and the system has experienced regression defects, focusing on the maturity of the test process will ensure that the test automation is built on a solid foundation. This involves establishing a structured test process that integrates with both the waterfall and agile lifecycle, ensuring that the automated tests are maintainable, reusable, and provide effective coverage. Without a mature test process, the automation efforts may not align with the business requirements and could result in ineffective testing or further regression issues.
References = The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus and study resources emphasize the importance of a mature test process when implementing test automation. It is essential for ensuring that the automation aligns with the test strategy and provides value to the organization1234.
NEW QUESTION # 45
Designing the System Under Test (SUT) for testability is important for a good test automation approach and can also benefit manual test execution.
Which of the following is NOT a consideration when designing for testability?
- A. Re-useability: The code written for the SUT must be re-useable for other similar system.
- B. Observability: The SUT needs to provide interface that give insight into the system.
- C. Clearly defined architecture: The SUT Architecture needs to provide clear and understandable interfaces giving control and visibility on all test levels.
- D. Control: the SUT needs to provide interfaces that can be used to perform actions on SUT.
Answer: A
Explanation:
The concept of reusability is not a primary consideration when designing a System Under Test (SUT) for testability. Testability focuses on the ease with which a system can be tested. This includes how well the system can be observed and controlled during testing, and whether its architecture supports testing on all levels. While reusability of code is a beneficial attribute in software development, it does not directly impact the testability of the SUT. Testability is more concerned with observability, controllability, and the clarity of the architecture to facilitate effective and efficient testing. References = The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus and study materials emphasize the importance of designing an SUT for testability to ensure that automated tests can be performed effectively. These resources outline key considerations such as observability, controllability, and a clearly defined architecture, which are essential for test automation12345.
NEW QUESTION # 46
When the SUT provides interfaces that can then be used to perform actions on the SUT, what is this called?
SELECT ONE OPTION
- A. Observability
- B. Maintainability
- C. Controllability
- D. Portability
Answer: C
Explanation:
Controllability refers to the degree to which a system, such as the System Under Test (SUT), allows inputs to be injected in a controlled manner. When the SUT provides interfaces that can be used to perform actions on it, this characteristic is essential for test automation because it enables the test engineer to manipulate the system's state and behavior during testing. Controllability is crucial for ensuring that tests can be performed consistently and effectively, as it allows for precise control over the test conditions. References = ISTQB materials define controllability as a key attribute of a testable system. It is discussed in the context of test automation, particularly in relation to the interfaces provided by the SUT that allow for controlled manipulation during testing12.
NEW QUESTION # 47
You are executing the first test run of a test automation suite of 200 tests. All the relevant information related to the state of the SUT and to the automated test execution is stored in a small database. During the Automated test run you observe that the first 10 test pass, while an abnormal termination occurs when executing the 11th test. This test does not complete its execution and the overall execution of the suite is aborted. An immediate analysis of the abnormal termination is expected to be time consuming and you have been asked to produce a detailed report of the execution results for the first test run, as soon as possible.
What is the MOST important FIRST step to be taken immediately after the abnormal occurred when executing the 11th test?
- A. Take a backup of the database in its current state. So It can be analyzed later
- B. Re-run the test automation suite starting from the 1st test.
- C. Return the database to a consistent state that allows subsequent test to run
- D. Re-run the test automation suite starting from the 12th test
Answer: A
Explanation:
The most crucial first step after an abnormal termination is to take a backup of the database in its current state.
This ensures that you have a snapshot of the system at the point of failure, which is invaluable for a thorough post-mortem analysis. Without this, you may lose critical information about the state of the system that could help identify the root cause of the failure. Once the backup is secured, you can proceed with restoring the system to a consistent state and continue with subsequent tests or rerun the test suite as needed.
References = The ISTQB Test Automation Engineer syllabus and best practices highlight the importance of error recovery processes and the preservation of test artifacts for analysis. Taking a backup aligns with these guidelines as it allows for an accurate assessment of the failure and aids in improving the
NEW QUESTION # 48
......
ISTQB CT-TAE (Certified Tester Test Automation Engineer) certification exam is a globally recognized certification program designed specifically for professionals who are involved in test automation. Certified Tester Test Automation Engineer certification is designed to validate the knowledge and skills of individuals in the field of test automation and to provide them with a professional edge over their peers. The CT-TAE certification exam is ideal for professionals who want to enhance their knowledge of test automation and demonstrate their expertise in the field.
True CT-TAE Exam Extraordinary Practice For the Exam: https://www.real4prep.com/CT-TAE-exam.html
Get 100% Passing Success With True CT-TAE Exam: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1TUCJc1sTAhaNkKNeAVj6l50hu-qayCPA